
Expertise
BIR Audit & Tax Assessment Defense
Document-led counsel for BIR notices, assessments and corporate tax risk.

Document-led review of active BIR matters
NLF assists with the assessment of audit authority, factual adjustments, procedural choices and supporting records. Work may cover LOA response, NOD or PAN submissions, FLD/FAN protests and CTA proceedings where accepted under an agreed scope. Outcomes depend on law, facts and the record; no result is promised.

Understanding the BIR Audit Process
A BIR audit may begin through the BIR's current electronic audit-authority process and can involve examination of records for identified taxable periods. The applicable audit controls, authorized personnel, document requests, and procedural safeguards must be assessed against the current BIR framework and the records issued for the specific matter. RMO No. 1-2026, together with later 2026 issuances, introduced a revised audit framework and a Single-Instance Audit Framework.
The audit process can move through several stages, each with its own procedural requirements and statutory deadlines. The correct response depends on the document received, the date and manner of receipt, the taxpayer's records, and the current applicable issuance. Missing an applicable statutory protest or appeal deadline can have serious consequences, including finality of an assessment and the commencement of collection remedies.
The most common deficiency findings in BIR audits involve undeclared income, disallowed expenses, VAT discrepancies between the Summary List of Sales/Purchases and the VAT returns, withholding tax deficiencies, and documentary stamp tax issues. Many of these findings arise not from intentional non-compliance but from technical documentation gaps, missing official receipts, invoices without the required information, or input VAT claims that cannot be substantiated.
Each document creates a different decision
Record receipt and classify the document before counting any deadline. LOA review concerns authority and initial response; NOD discussion concerns discrepancies; the FLD/FAN guide addresses formal protest and CTA routes.
The legal and factual position should be assessed together. Do not assume a pending challenge suspends an audit or that every follow-up letter restarts an appeal period.
Build the position from available records
Review begins with the audit authority, notices, returns, books and supporting evidence. Revenue-officer working papers are reviewed if available or properly obtained; access should not be promised as automatic.
The output should identify factual reconciliations, legal objections, evidentiary gaps and procedural choices. A request for reinvestigation suspends prescription under the relevant Section 223 ground only when granted, not merely when requested.
What We Handle
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I ignore a BIR LOA?
A BIR document should be reviewed promptly because different documents carry different procedural consequences and response periods. Management should identify the document, receipt date, taxable period, authorized scope, and next applicable deadline before deciding how to respond.
What is the difference between a Request for Reconsideration and a Request for Reinvestigation?
A Request for Reconsideration asks the BIR to re-evaluate its findings based on existing records, no new evidence is submitted. A Request for Reinvestigation allows you to submit new or additional evidence within 60 days. The choice affects the computation of the prescriptive period for BIR collection.
Can a BIR assessment be challenged?
A taxpayer may have protest, evidentiary, administrative, compromise, abatement, or appeal options depending on the assessment and the governing law. Any option must be assessed against the facts, documents, deadlines, and current BIR and CTA rules. Nopuente Law Firm does not guarantee a particular outcome.
How long does a BIR audit take?
There is no universal 120-day rule that makes every audit authority automatically lapse. Timing depends on the applicable BIR framework, the audit record, taxpayer submissions, statutory periods, and any ensuing protest or litigation. A current, matter-specific review is necessary.
Legal Disclaimer: The information on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this page. Laws and regulations change; the information above reflects our understanding as of the date of publication and may not reflect subsequent amendments or new jurisprudence. Outcomes in legal matters depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case. Nopuente Law Firm makes no guarantees of specific legal outcomes. Consult a qualified Philippine lawyer for advice on your specific situation.
Discuss Your Matter
Provide only high-level information reasonably necessary for conflict and scope screening. Engagement is subject to conflict checking and written acceptance.
People
Relevant counsel and support.
Assignments follow the firm’s assessment of fit, conflicts and scope.


Related firm insights
Begin with the issue
Contact