Consultation
Focused initial assessment and oral guidance during an agreed session. Further work is separately scoped.
Consultation scope
ContactCorporate governance
Review authority, approvals and the records behind your business.

Corporate Compliance & Governance Review
A structured review of selected corporate records, governance actions, signing authority, SEC reportorial position, beneficial-ownership documentation, corporate books, and regulatory-account controls.
Professional fee
Subject to the firm’s quotation
For corporations within the defined standard scope
A defined-scope legal-control engagement, not SEC filing assistance, corporate-secretary services, a compliance certification, or an assurance that every legal risk has been identified.
Professional fees are VAT-exclusive.
Submitting an inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship. Engagement is subject to conflict checking and written acceptance.
Choose the form of engagement
Focused initial assessment and oral guidance during an agreed session. Further work is separately scoped.
Consultation scopeA specified issue, document set and deliverable. A diagnostic does not include every corrective step or ongoing representation.
Business review scopeRecurring routine capacity for the named client, within plan limits. Substantial projects and disputes require separate scope.
Counsel scopeBusiness Legal Risk Review spans selected corporate, contractual, employer, tax-process and compliance risks. Corporate Compliance & Governance Review focuses more narrowly on corporate records, governance, authority, reportorial position and account custody. They are distinct engagements.
An OPC is not required to submit and file corporate bylaws. Its single stockholder may act through a signed and dated written resolution recorded in the minutes book. Reporting requirements must be checked for the actual entity and reporting period.
The standard-scope description is an NLF service boundary, not a statement that other entities have no compliance obligations. Entity fit and any expanded scope remain subject to confirmation.
The review gives management a documented picture of selected corporate records, apparent inconsistencies, actions that need verification or regularization, authority and approval questions, reportorial responsibility, regulatory-account custody, and the next actions that are appropriate within scope.
Selected records and management disclosures, tied to the actual entity and agreed scope.
A practical management deliverable rather than miscellaneous lawyer comments.
Review control and custody, not passwords, OTPs, authentication codes, or private cryptographic credentials.
Non-stock corporations, partnerships, foreign corporations, public-interest corporations, entities with secondary licenses, heavily regulated businesses, and incentive-sensitive enterprises may require lawyer review before standard scope is confirmed.
This is a scope control, not a reason to give misleading advice. If additional material is reasonably necessary for an included issue, NLF may substitute documents, request limited material, or recommend expanded scope before further work.
Seven corporate-control areas
01
Selected formation records, Articles, By-Laws where applicable, amendments, registered identity, capital structure, principal office, corporate purpose, and key organizational information.
02
Selected ownership, capitalization, applicable SEC ownership reports, stock-and-transfer, and beneficial-ownership records, including HARBOR-related responsibility where applicable.
03
For an ordinary stock corporation, the most recent annual stockholders’ meeting, up to four selected board meetings or equivalent written actions, and selected material resolutions within the agreed document set. For an OPC, the review concerns applicable single-stockholder resolutions and minutes-book records instead.
04
An Existing Authority Map: who appears authorized for selected transactions, what approval or governing-record support exists, and which authority questions need verification. It does not invent authority limits.
05
Selected records and evidence concerning the reports applicable to the entity, including GIS where required, financial statements and other recurring reports, filing confirmations, eWATCH status, disclosed notices, and ownership of reporting responsibility.
06
Control and continuity around authorized users, filer roles, corporate contact channels, recovery ownership, backup ownership, and revocation. NLF never asks for passwords, OTPs, or authentication codes.
07
Whether selected essential records appear to exist, who maintains them, where they are maintained, apparent material gaps, and items that may require deeper reconstruction.
The review is not a shortcut for a live transaction, shareholder dispute, forensic reconstruction, regulatory investigation, deadline-sensitive filing, or heavily regulated-business assessment.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Supported by Records, Needs Verification, and Action Required are working classifications for the selected materials, not compliance scores or assurances. Where management has no formal authority policy, the report identifies a management decision required rather than inventing a limit on behalf of the corporation.
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Initial intake should not include passwords, OTPs, or bulk confidential records. NLF confirms conflicts, entity fit, scope, and accepted materials before substantive review. Further remediation or filing work, if appropriate, is separately evaluated and remains optional.
No. The review identifies issues apparent from selected records and disclosed facts within scope. It is not a certification or assurance engagement.
Potentially. NLF will confirm entity fit because the OPC workflow differs from an ordinary stock-corporation workflow.
The review maps apparent existing authority and questions requiring verification. A proposed delegation or reserved-matters matrix, if appropriate, requires separate corporate decision-making and scope.
No. NLF reviews authorized-user, custody, continuity, and recovery controls. Do not send passwords, OTPs, or authentication codes.
Where objectively warranted, filing, regularization, corporate-secretary, transaction, dispute, or specialist work may be separately scoped. The diagnostic has standalone value.
Request a conflict check and scope confirmation. Please do not send passwords, OTPs, bulk documents, or other confidential records through the initial form.
Request Conflict Check & Scope ConfirmationSubmitting an inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship. Conflict clearance and written engagement acceptance are required before representation begins.